All posts by JosephForefathers

A Patriot of the United States of America, sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. I am an oath keeper!

First Amendment – Redacted

Blog-Icon---Political

by JosephForeFathers

Warning I’ve spent weeks thinking about this topic and gathering many sources for this one post, so there are more hyperlinks than I normally use, but each one is worth the watch and/or read.

 

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (Emphasis added)

This is The First Amendment.

There is a reason our forefathers made this THE FIRST AMENDMENT.  Because it is clearly the most important.

Our freedom of speech is our most basic right as human beings.  It’s how we communicate with each other on a daily basis.

But you need to know something.

That “freedom” is now nothing more than an illusion.

For instance:

It’s funny because it’s true!

HA.

Ha.

ha.

Actually that fact that this kind of thing IS true, as seen here, makes it a sobering reality and quite depressing, frankly.

And the really scary thing about this is the TSA, who are supposed to be protecting our airways, rather than jailing innocent people, are actually letting almost anything that looks like a bomb pass through security, as shown here & here.

But I digress.

We are seeing time and again news stories left and right about how we truly have lost our freedom of speech.   And now you’re not even safe on social media, like this girl, here.

Screen-Shot-2015-04-06-at-8.25.25-AM

Yes, she was arrested for posting  a selfie.  I understand she had a gun, but it wasn’t a threat.  (Don’t even get me started on her lack of trigger discipline, I’ll save that for another post.)  She was expressing herself just as we all do every day on social media.

But as you’ll read in the article Kevin Carrol of the Fraternal Order of Police blatantly states, ““It’s actually against the law to say it in public,”  “It’s a part of the disorderly conduct statute. If it’s against the law to say it in public..why wouldn’t it be against the law to say it to someone through a computer?”

Well, Officer Carrol, because it’s an infringement on the First Amendment!!!  It should NOT be illegal to say in public.  It shouldn’t be illegal to SAY anything in public!!!

Ok, yes, we all know we should be careful on social media these days.  But I can put a sign in my yard, or on my building if I want, right?

Sure, as long as you’re not talking bad about the government.

crc-sign

 

This happened in Norfolk, VA and the city government told the owner of the company, “a banner of the same size, in the same location, would have been perfectly permissible if, rather than protesting city policy, it depicted the city flag or crest.

So not only are they infringing on the freedom of speech they’re also infringing on the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Well that’s just one small company.  They couldn’t do that to a big company.
What? Like DirecTV?
Don’t you love those Rob Lowe and alter-ego Rob Lowe funny commercials?  Well, say GOODBYE to them!  GONE!
Why, you ask?  Because Comcast got all bent out of shape saying that DirecTV had false advertising despite “DirectTV … said its customers get 99 percent signal reliability, the ‘best picture quality and sound’ in the industry and more sports channels than with other competitors. The company also says to has the highest customer satisfaction rating among all TV providers and has ranked higher than cable for more than 10 years,”
Of course they bickered about whether or not that was true, but bottom line, Comcast got offended, and DirecTV had to pull a great idea for an ad campaign.
But what about false advertising?
Yeah? What about it?  Turns out the current administration actually thinks false advertising is a great idea as seen here and here.
prop·a·gan·da
ˌpräpəˈɡandə/
noun
noun: propaganda; noun: Propaganda
  1. 1.
    derogatory
    information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
    “he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda”
    But isn’t propaganda bad?!?
    Um, yeah, that’s why it was made illegal in 1948 after WWII by the Smith-Mundt Act, but you don’t have to worry about that anymore.  It’s now perfectly legal for the government to feed you whatever lies they want.
    Seriously.
    What was that again about “transparency?”

     

    WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

    This is a call to action.  Because right now we are no more free than Dr. Theo Caulder as portrayed by Cuba Gooding Jr. in the movie Instinct.  (Great movie, and SPOILER ALERT, I’m posting the climax!) But this is exactly where we are sitting right now, only we are not being given the lesson.  We are roaming about with our illusions in tact.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHayfO0OClU

     

    I’m stepping off my soap box for now.  But just remember that our freedoms that are granted by our creator are certain unalienable rights.  Namely; ” Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness…”  And the Bill of Rights is supposed to guarantee things that allow us to live life in the most fulfilling way we can.  It doesn’t guarantee success, only the opportunity for success.  But if we don’t even have the freedoms granted by our Bill of Rights, then we truly have lost our Republic.

    -Joseph Forefathers

“No Room in This Country for Hyphenated American”

Blog-Icon---Social
by Joseph Forefathers
There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all.
This is just as true of the man who puts “native” before the hyphen as of the man who puts German or Irish or English or French before the hyphen. Americanism is a matter of the spirit and of the soul. Our allegiance must be purely to the United States. We must unsparingly condemn any man who holds any other allegiance.
But if he is heartily and singly loyal to this Republic, then no matter where he was born, he is just as good an American as any one else.
The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English- Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian- Americans, or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality than with the other citizens of the American Republic.
The men who do not become Americans and nothing else are hyphenated Americans; and there ought to be no room for them in this country. The man who calls himself an American citizen and who yet shows by his actions that he is primarily the citizen of a foreign land, plays a thoroughly mischievous part in the life of our body politic. He has no place here; and the sooner he returns to the land to which he feels his real heart-allegiance, the better it will be for every good American.”
Theodore Roosevelt 
Address to the Knights of Columbus 
New York City- October 12th, 1915


I believe Raven Symone has a similar mind-frame:

And Morgan Freeman:

I love what Allen West has to say about this too:

 

 

Hyphenated Americans need to STOP segregating themselves.  By adding your simple adjective you are relegating yourselves as non-inclusive in the American experiment.   Should you know and be proud of your heritage?  Of course!  History is important, and it is true that those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.  However, to LIVE in the past by demanding labels is to ignore the future.  And in ignoring the future you are failing to plan for the future.

And failing to plan is planning to fail.

As Allen West stated in the video “the welfare system is a great safety net, but it should not become a hammock.”  Welfare can become another form of slavery when the people become dependent upon it.

“A house divided against itself cannot stand.” I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.”

― Abraham Lincoln

I believe this is just as true now as it was then.  Are we to become a welfare state?   Or will we value our rights, our liberty, and our sacred honor enough to FIGHT for them, to keep this country free?  Fight to unite this country to become great once again.  Fight for a colorblind society.  Fight to get rid of Affirmative Action.  It has become obsolete.   Fight for Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream where everyone “will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”
If we are not united, we will fall.
empowered_man_imgmapzoom__80443.1351554552.1280.1280__76964.1407681884.1280.1280
-Joseph Forefathers

Love or Hate?

Blog-Icon---Religion

Preface:

(Allow me to reiterate, if you haven’t read my blogs before, that I love the human race.  I love people and individuals.  I love learning about people’s life experiences, and while I do not agree with everything everyone chooses to do, I do believe the greatest gift God gave us is our freedom of will.

That being said, I do NOT tolerate bullies in any form, and will stand up for anyone who is peaceably living their life WITHOUT infringing on the life, liberty, or pursuit of happiness of others.)


I’ve noticed throughout the years that ever since things started to become “politically correct” that the wolf of hate has more and more frequently donned the proverbial sheep of love’s clothing.

Lets look at a very obvious example.  The Westboro “Baptist Church.”  I think we can all agree that a group who pickets funerals of fallen soldiers with signs that say “Thank God For Dead Soldiers” along side other signs that say “God Hates F*gs” is more than a little misguided and is spewing hate.  The really sad part about this organization is that they have convinced themselves that they do this out of love.  They believe so vehemently  that God is dooming this nation because of the acceptance of homosexuality.  Check it out for yourself here.

Do I agree with “gay marriage?” No.  But that’s a different post altogether.

On the flip side we have the Chik-fil-A protesters.  Remember this guy? His name is Adam Smith and he was the CFO of Vante.  After making a fool of himself by way of video-selfie and harassing a young woman who was just doing her job, he takes his frustrations about the whole corporation out on her.  Then he has the brilliant idea to post it online.  Guess what?  He got fired.  Vante stated,

“Vante regrets the unfortunate events that transpired yesterday in Tucson between our former CFO/Treasurer Adam Smith and an employee at Chick-fil-A … Effective immediately, Mr. Smith is no longer an employee of our company.”
“We hope that the general population does not hold Mr. Smith’s actions against Vante and its employees.”

If you didn’t watch his video that I hyper-linked, let me set the stage and give you some of his gems.

He’s mad because the CEO of Chick-fil-A for publicly stating he was in support of traditional marriage and had given money to organizations that support traditional marriage.  During the filming of this video, Chick-fil-A was under a lot of backlash, and other individual supporters of traditional marriage showed up in droves around the country in support of the CEO’s statement and beliefs.  Chick-fil-A’s all over the country were running out of food because they had no idea of the support that would come in.

But there was another group of people as well.  A smaller group of people that were trying to counteract the income of all the support Chick-fil-A was receiving by ordering a free water. 

REALLY?!?

Are there really so many people arrogant enough to think that a handful of people ordering nothing but water would counteract the sales of millions of people waiting in lines miles long to purchase any product they could just to show their support?

Some of Adam Smith’s quotes, while he’s waiting to order and in the process of getting his free water.

“People have to have their Chick-fil-A, anti-gay breakfast sandwich.  Mmm! Always tastes better when it’s full of hate! Mmm! Yeah. Love it!”

“Here I go!” said with an enthusiasm of someone about to go on a roller coaster.

“Is this my free water? You know why I’m getting my free water, right?  Because Chick-fil-A is a hateful organization.”

“The corporation gives money to hate groups.”

Groups he was referring to?  Winshape, a Christian organization that supports traditional marriage. The Marriage and Family Foundation, that supports traditional marriage.  The Family Research Council, another organization that supports traditional marriage.  Other information on it here.

So once again, before you go saying that “traditional marriage is against gay rights,” you didn’t read my other blog on gay marriage.  Please, read it here.

Believe it or not, I actually do have love for all people.  “Marriage” is what defines the religious union between a man and a woman, bound by God.  Trying to “redefine marriage” to me makes about as much sense as trying to “redefine gravity.”

So on to my main point.  I saw this on Facebook, and I could not ignore it.   Please take the time to read and watch this whole video so we’re on the same page.

And in case you don’t here are some quotes from it.

“Jihad is means, and not a goal in and of itself.  It is a means to establish monotheism on the land.”  “I have been commanded to fight the people until they testify…”

“The life and property of a Mushrik (someone who worships another than allah) holds no value in the state of jihad.”

“The life and property of a Mushrik becomes ‘halal’ (officially allowed by sharia) while in a state a jihad.”

Here’s the most disturbing part,

“I have been commanded to fight the people until they say (declaration of islamic faith) and when they say (declaration of islamic faith) … their life and property become protected from me.  Which means if they don’t say ( declaration of islamic faith) their life and property are halal (free for the taking, legally) for the Muslims.”

“So the Christians do commit shirk, they are kufar (unbelievers) they are mushrakoon (polytheists.)  The mushrakoon are filthy.  They are … filthy. A spiritual filthiness which can only be purified by the purity of monotheism.  Allah calls the mushrakoon ‘nudges,’ which is a very evil thing when Allah himself calls the mushrakoon ‘nudges’ himself! They are najasa (feces, urine, filthy or contaminated) a filthy impure dirty substance. “

So in essence they believe that anyone who does not believe what they do, is filth that they must fight them until they testify the same thing that they believe, and until they do, their life and property are legally free for the taking.

All in the name of Allah.

This, from the “religion of peace.”

Then you have the favorite liberal argument, “Oh well you’re just racist.”

Really?

How do you know what’s in my thoughts and what resides in my heart?  How am I a racist for simply expressing my beliefs? How I am a racist because I address unconstitutional policies that were put into place by usurping the Constitution?

All these things have led me to the conclusion that everybody that is spewing how “hateful” and “racist” that everyone else is, are in fact the hateful people themselves, and are projecting their emotions onto others.

I recently saw another story on Facebook that caught my eye as well.   His story is very unusual, but it is coming from the mouth of a former Muslim, who converted to Christianity.  Take it for what you will. But I highly recommend you watch it here.

He saw that every Christian he encountered wanted to help him.  Out of love and compassion.  That is what Christ taught.  Love and compassion and giving.  Not killing.  Not hate.

I don’t understand why so many Americans have become intolerant of Christians, when Christians (true Christians anyway) are taught to be like Christ. In love, forgiveness, and compassion.

If we all had a little more love for one another, and followed the first two commandments, I think this world would be a much better place.

Mark 12:30 teaches us

And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.

And 31 says,

“And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.”

If we all acted like we love God and acted like we loved our neighbors, what a difference we could all make in this world.  Actions would become habits, and habits would become part of our nature.

Again, I believe the greatest gift God gave us is our freedom of will.  Our will to act how we want, and what we do with that will, is what we will stand in judgement for in the judgement seat.

-Joseph Forefathers

 

“Gottabefirst!” Syndrome

Blog-Icon---Social

I’ve been driving for over 20 years.  During this time I’ve driven through major cities in California, Washington, Arizona, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Florida, Arkansas, Missouri, Illinois, Wisconsin, and I’ve been a passenger in vehicles in Virginia, Hawaii, and New York City.   The only reason I relay this information is in order to show I do have a good deal of experience on this topic.

So I’ve seen a lot of drivers, and driven a lot of places.  I have to say that by far the most polite drivers I’ve ever had the privilege of sharing the road with were in Seattle, WA.  They abide by the speed limit, they signal before changing lanes, they slow down in wet weather to accommodate poor driving conditions, and most importantly of all, they slow down when you signal so you can change lanes!  I even saw a traffic accident that happened right in front of me, and people immediately began slowing down and driving around the cars involved.

So if anybody from Seattle, WA is reading this, Thank You for being a courteous driver!

I’m sure the rest of us either remember or at least know about a little cartoon featuring Goofy called “Motor Mania” way back from 1950.  If you don’t know it, please, watch it.

I’ll wait.

(You know you want to watch it.)

… (6 minutes 39 seconds later) …

Welcome back.

Now that we’re all on the same page, I think it’s safe to assume that most of us, myself included, have been “Mr. (or Ms.) Wheeler”  at one point in time or another.

However in every other major city I’ve driven in, through, and around, I usually wind up sharing the road with Mr.-freaking-Wheeler.  And I don’t know why.  It doesn’t make sense.  Just doing the math about how many drivers occupying the road that have at least 5 years of driving experience you’d think that the majority of drivers are not novices.  Yet that’s how they behave.

So what is the “gottabefirst syndrome?” It’s the mental disorder that affects all drivers who allow their reasoning skills to be overrun by their desire to be the first driver … to reach the next stop light.

And THAT is what bothers me so much about them.  They are more than willing to be reckless drivers making poor choices and endangering everyone on the road around them simply so they can be the first one to reach the next stop light, sign, yield sign, traffic jam.  Trust me.  I know.  I’ve done it.

I know what it’s like to “just be in a hurry,” or “he cut me off, so I have to teach him a lesson,” or “I’m late for work, again!”

Regardless of your reason, TRUST ME, it’s NOT worth it!

Through personal experience I’ve learned that when you are more courteous to other drivers, and treat them as you would want to be treated, 9 times out of 10 you get cut off, flipped off, or even driven off the road!  People seriously lose their minds when they get behind the wheel of a car, and suddenly nothing in the world matters except their desire to get where they are going; anyone who gets in their way be DAMNED!!!

WHY has this become the norm in how we treat each other while on the road?  Why does it seem that reaching our destinations, and doing so in short order, has become critically more important than preserving the private property, sanity, and most importantly the LIVES of everyone with whom we are sharing the road?!?

In the city where I grew up you had to be VERY aggressive in order to just use the on-ramp to the highway.  In fact all your driving in my hometown needed to be more aggressive in order to just make it from point A to point B.  If you put on your blinker, you know you’re going to have to speed up and take that slowly opening spot, otherwise the cars behind you will see your blinker and speed up in order to get in front of you.

I used to drive a little four cylinder car, and was accelerating as fast as it would allow me from the access ramp to the highway, and an 18 wheeler in that first lane refused to slow down, regardless of the 15-20 car lengths between us, and forced me onto the shoulder so I wouldn’t get hit.

Or the numerous times driving from the access ramp to the highway when you have your blinker on, and the jerks behind you speed up, cut you off to get in front of you, just to make the very next off ramp!  All which could have been avoided, if they had just used a little common sense, slowed down, let you in, then they could calmly take the exit ramp.

Where I grew up, I learned it was necessary to be an appropriately aggressive AND defensive driver, in order to deal with the other inconsiderate  drivers on the road.  You can count on everyone on the road to be aggressive, so you can easily predict what they’re going to do and you drive in response accordingly.

Where I live now…is even worse.  It’s still a relatively large city, but at least where I grew up you knew drivers were aggressive, and predictably so.  But here, they’re not… But sometimes they are.  And sometimes they give mixed signals…literally.

Pop quiz on rules of the road:

If two cars simultaneously approach an intersection  with a 4 way stop, and the cars are perpendicular to each other, who has the right of way?

Answer: The car to the right.

I have already lost count of the number of times, that I was the car on the left.  I attempted to give way, and the car to the right waves me on.  And after several awkward seconds of me waiting for them to move through the intersection they wave me on to proceed.  After they wave me on, they begin accelerating to a point where if I had not reacted by accelerating even more  quickly, they would have hit me in the middle of the intersection!  I can’t help but think, “What is wrong with these people?!?”

And this doesn’t happen every time; the truly frustrating part about all this is that nobody is consistent.  You can never predict what the other drivers are going to do.  Sometimes they are polite, sometimes they cut across 4 lanes of traffic to make their exit; you just never know!

Back to my original point, we have standard rules of the road.  We have speed limits.  We have traffic lights, signs, and a plethora of information to make driving a more or less safe activity.  But when we ignore that critical information around us, because we’re too busy texting, updating status’ on social media, and we combine that lack of situational awareness and find ourselves speeding, then we have just mentioned the TOP TWO reasons for  accidents.

Distracted driving, and speeding.

“But what about drunk driving? Isn’t that the top cause of accidents?”

Nope…it’s number three.

Number 4, reckless driving.

It’s not until we get to number 5 that we start getting reasons that are beyond the control of the driver.  The 5th top reason for accidents is rain.

Which brings me to my next story.

I was driving home from work one day, and it was pouring, cats and dogs.  Sheets of rain were coming down.  I was in the fast lane, the speed limit was 65, and I was only doing 40.  I was passing other cars, but I felt safe doing it.  Enter reasons 2, 4, and 5 for the top causes of accidents.  This massive 4X4 was flying down the road, coming up from behind FAST.  He was definitely exceeding the speed limit (#2), driving extremely recklessly (#4), AND it was raining (#5).  While I was in the process of thinking, “This guy is literally going to kill me,” he swerved unnecessarily around me, getting into the lane to my immediate right.  (This is an 8 lane, divided highway, again I’m in the far left lane.)  So I let off the accelerator as he passed me on the right, and am VERY glad I did so, as he cut me off as he returned to the far left lane.  But in doing so, he fishtailed, as I was still slowing down, and he over-corrected from the shoulder lane, consequently slamming into the tail end of the car that was in front of me, which was approximately 10 car lengths away, as I was keeping ample distance from all the cars in front of me, due to the rain.   Both cars began spinning across the remaining 3 lanes of traffic to the right, and the impacted car ended up in the ditch, the offending truck hit a street sign.

I stopped on the left shoulder to call 9-1-1.  I stayed there until emergency crews showed up, and gave my report to the police, since I figured I was the primary witness.  The only reason I did not get out to attempt to render aid, is because immediately after the accident, the flow of traffic continued flowing as normal.  It wasn’t safe for me to cross 4 lanes of traffic on foot, in the torrential downpour.  When the police showed up and asked if I was involved, I told them I just wanted to give a statement, and he told me to meet him at the nearest gas station.  When I met him there he told me both parties were transported to the hospital via ambulance.

What I’m getting at is that the top four causes for accidents are all driver induced, preventable, and selfish reasons!

The next time you get into a car, think about others.  Think about safety.  Your text message can wait.  Your meeting may start without you, but at least you’ll be alive to attend it.  And for the love of all that is good and holy, call a freaking cab, uber, lyft, or designated driver! Do NOT think you are safe to drive a car if you have consumed more than one drink of alcohol per hour.

Don’t be a victim of “Gottabefirst Syndrome.”  It’s 100% preventable, because it’s a choice. The top 4 causes of accidents are because of selfishness.  Be a part of the solution by choosing how you drive.  We can lower these stats by making a simple choice.

Drive safely.

 

-Joseph Forefathers.

Why the “Gay Marriage” Debate Will Never Be Settled

Blog-Icon---Religion

As stated in previous posts, I am a Christian, and a conservative, but before you just click on to the next page, hear me out, because I may not come across as offensive as the title may suggest.

For us Christians marriage was designed by God Himself when He created Adam and Eve.  He created Eve as “an help meet” for Adam as a companion and spouse.  So because marriage is as old as the human race itself, it is by and far a religious institution and according to the first amendment of the Constitution

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion…” therefore Congress has no right or say on what “marriage” is defined as.  Because, for us Christians, marriage was created by God, and trying to change the definition of marriage is as ridiculous to us as trying to change the definition of the law of gravity.

What I’ve observed over the years is that those that believe otherwise, and feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, is that they believe that marriage is a government institution and therefore needs to be governed by the laws of man.   And surely this must be so if marriage is recognized by state laws, and we have tax breaks for married couples, surely marriage is a government institution, right?

Well considering the fact that the Constitution was written specifically to protect religious freedoms, ie, that you may practice how you want, or are free to not practice any religion at all, and the Constitution specifically does state, in the 10th Amendment,

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

we can infer that marriage is not governed by the Constitution, and is left up to the states.

But I’m getting ahead of myself.

Lets examine the Bible for marriage references.

1 Corinthians 7:38,

Luke 20:34, 

John 2:1

Hebrews 13:4

Matthew 22:9

Ok, I could keep listing numerous scripture references, but I think you get the point…marriage is in the Bible, and if we read Genesis 4:1 it clearly states that Adam and Eve were married.

If the Bible clearly states that Adam and Eve were married, and Adam and Eve were created by God, and the Bible is religious text, then it can hardly be argued that marriage is NOT religious.   And if marriage IS religious, then the 1st Amendment applies and “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”

So say us Christians.

On the flip side, I hear the argument all the time, “Marriage is between two people that LOVE each other.” And “equal rights for gays and lesbians!”

But from a Christian viewpoint, if God created Adam and Eve, and Adam and Eve were married, then it stands to reason that only a man and a woman are even ABLE to get married.  So like the gravity analogy, for us Christians, it’s like saying you want gravity to only apply in certain situations.   It’s like saying, “Well, just because the majority of right handed people are affected by gravity doesn’t mean we should all be affected by it, so gravity shouldn’t apply to anyone who is left handed. LEFTIES of the world unite!”

So it’s not about us not loving you; we DO LOVE YOU! It’s not about discrimination, it not about hate, or bullying.  But what you’re asking simply does not make any sense!

…to us.

And on that note,  let it be known, that I do have many gay and lesbian friends, and no, not just “facebook friends.”   These are people from my childhood.  From college.  From life.  And I would personally take a bullet for any of them because I love them!

I DO NOT CONDONE BULLYING, AND ABHOR IT IN ANY FORM!!!

So back to trying to explain the flip side, I can empathize and attempt to understand why “it’s not fair” that just because laws are written a specific way, that it prevents you from “marrying” the one you love.

So, here’s my solution.

Government no longer recognizes marriage.

Yup, I said it.  Take marriage out of the equation.

From now on, government can only recognize and authorize what I’m going to call “legal unions.” And ANY TWO consenting adults (younger with parental consent) can get a “legal union.”  You can only get ONE legal union at a time.  You can sever it at any time through the courts, and get another legal union to somebody else, but only one current union at a time.  Go ahead and transfer all current marriages into unions and throw away the “legal marriage certificates.”  Put any name you want on it, bond, partnership, couple-hood, anything, except marriage.  A government “legal union” will give you all the same rights, tax breaks, etc. as a marriage, but it is NOT a marriage.

Because marriage is a religious institution, marriages will still be performed, but only by authorized members of the clergy from religious organizations.  If you want a “marriage” it can ONLY be done in a church, but a marriage gives you only the recognition of the church that performed the marriage, NO LEGAL RIGHTS.

Which brings me to another topic that I have to address, but won’t go into too much detail.  The Oregon couple who were forced to pay $150,000 in damages to a lesbian couple for choosing not to bake them a wedding cake.  This is where things cross the line.  The Oregon couple had served and sold their bakery goods to this lesbian couple before, but because of their Christian beliefs, felt it was a violation of their conscience to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding.  (What happened to “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason?”) This baker couple’s 1st Amendment rights were violated when they were forced to pay anything for a reason like this.  This is a very slippery slope, because how long before the government starts forcing churches to perform weddings that aren’t in alignment with their beliefs?

So because all this is very unlikely to ever happen, this is why the “gay marriage” debate will never end, and probably never be resolved.

Obviously any two people who are in love can’t deny their feelings.  Conversely, people who are bound at a fundamental level in their faith, can’t deny their feelings either.

My attempt at a resolution  by introducing the “legal union” is an attempt to agree to disagree on a legal level, and to keep the peace, and try to make everyone happy.

Your thoughts?

 

-Joseph Forefathers

50 Shades of the War on Women

Blog-Icon---Pop-Culture

In this day and age you’d think some basic things that have plagued our society would be addressed.   We all know tobacco is bad. There’s an entire organization specifically dedicated to raise awareness about the harmful affects of smoking. (Truth campaign, anyone? I love their ads!)

Well there is something that is as old as the oldest profession, that has always loomed in the dark corners of society, that most people rather not talk about but we all know is there.  Ok, that’s not entirely true, a lot of people talk about it all the time.  Because it’s become “normal,” and “acceptable.”

I’m talking about pornography.

From mainstream movies like Don Jon, to scientific studies conducted introducing the concept of the Coolidge effect, it has become glaringly obvious that pornography is NOT a GOOD thing!

Especially in this day and age of high speed internet where not only is any amount of pornography available at our fingertips, but in blazingly fast internet speeds.  The speed here is important because if you click on the hyperlink I have on the Coolidge effect it says:

“What happens when you drop a male rat into a cage with a receptive female rat? First, you see a frenzy of copulation. Then, progressively, the male tires of that particular female. Even if she wants more, he has had enough. However, replace the original female with a fresh one, and the male immediately revives and gallantly struggles to fertilise (sic) her. You can repeat this process with fresh females until he is completely wiped out.

This is called the Coolidge effect—the automatic response to novel mates. It’s what might have started you down the road to getting hooked on Internet porn.”

It has become SUCH an issue that organizations have popped up because pornography addiction has become rampant, and we are desperately trying to fight it.  Organizations such as Porn Harms, Fight the New Drug, and Porn Addicts Anonymous to name a few.

So if we consider that high speed internet gives an opportunity for the Coolidge effect (ie many “partners” in rapid succession) but READING an erotic novel takes more time, effort, and commitment, causing the reader to have longer dopamine releases then why, OH WHY, do people STILL call them “romance novels,” or “adult novels” when it truly is nothing more, than porn?

If you click here it leads to a site called “Your Brain on Porn” and it addresses this specific issue from a recovering addict, who states,

I find erotic stories can be worse than porn in some ways, as it takes much longer to read a story, which can lead to very long dopamine rushes. They are often broken up into multiple parts, which the author keeps building upon, leading to an endless need to keep returning for a fix.

You think binging for hours for that perfect shot in a video is pathetic? Imagine searching for that “perfect” scene in a sea of words. Looking for that one sentence in a 20 page story that will scratch that itch. Not in this story? How about the next one? The next one.. Years of my life have been wasted chasing the fix in erotic stories. sigh

So porn is bad.  No matter what form it’s in.  Video. Pictures. Novels. You name it, Porn = BAD.

Now that this poorly written porn fan fiction has turned into a movie, women all over the country are falling over themselves to go watch it.

Pause

Hold that thought.

If you are familiar with the “war on women” you know it’s a common phrase to denote certain conservative policies that really aren’t about women’s rights, as much as they are trying to push their own liberal agenda of “free health care” i.e. contraceptives, abortions.

Unpause

The 50 Shades series has recently released the movie version of the first book.  In it, the protagonist begins a relationship with a man who introduces her into the BDSM lifestyle.

BDSM AKA Bondage, Dominance, Sadism and Masochism. Or Sadomasochism. I’m only going to address the latter two.

If we go to the DSM IV {Diagnostic Standards for Mental Disorders] (I know the DSM V has recently been published, and I’ll address that in a minute) it states the diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism are

“A. Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving acts (real, not simulated) in which the psychological or physical suffering (including humiliation) of the victim is sexually exciting to the person.

B. The person has acted on these urges with a nonconsenting person, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty.”

(Sounds like something we should all know the definition of… something called RAPE.)

Masochism was actually only addressed in the DSM III, and taken out of the DSM IV, but part of the definition in the 3rd edition is this:

“The masochist deliberately provokes, solicits, and incites angry, disparaging, and rejecting responses from others in order to feel on “familiar territory”: humiliated, defeated, devastated, and hurt.”

The full description is here.

 

Now as far as the DSM V is concerned this 5th edition has made a drastic change and has begun using an umbrella term called “Paraphilic Disorders” to identify any unusual sexual behaviors, but ONLY (get this) IF the person “feel(s) personal distress about their interest, not merely distress resulting from society’s disapproval; OR ha(s) a sexual desire or behavior that involves another person’s psychological distress, injury, or death, or a desire for sexual behaviors involving unwilling persons or persons unable to give legal consent.”

Essentially saying that no matter what your sexual exploits are, it’s no longer  a “mental disorder” unless you feel personal distress about it.

Unless you feel personal distress about it.

So now the medical community is saying that you only have a sexual mental disorder IF YOU feel personal distress about your own actions?!?  (ie a rapist only has a mental disorder if he or she feels bad about being a rapist.)

That is giving the green light on so many different things that I didn’t even want to address in this post but now feel obligated to. I mean, do I even have to say it?

Pedophilia, necrophilia, beastiality.

(And if anyone reading this even attempts to rationalize pedophilia, necrophilia, or beastiality, then you are clearly not a rational person, and I will not dignify any attempt of rationalization with a response.)

Back to the topic at hand, sadism is “intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving acts (real, not simulated) in which the psychological or physical suffering (including humiliation) of the victim is sexually exciting to the person. ” And masochism is WANTING to “incite…feel(ings) on ‘familiar territory’: humiliated, defeated, devastated, and hurt.” (Once again, rape.)

There is nothing about either of these behaviors that is healthy. There is nothing about either of these behaviors that is “average.”  There is nothing about either of these behaviors that is GOOD!

I had somebody try to “explain” it to me one time, because they were participants in the life style.  This person tried to tell me how BDSM is about love and trust.  Someone please tell me how causing psychological or physical suffering or wanting to feel humiliated, defeated, devastated and hurt has ANYTHING to do with LOVE!?!

Love.  Compassion. Tenderness.  Intensity. Passion.

Psychological & Physical harm. Humiliation. Devastation. Defeat.

These feelings cannot healthily co-exist .  And anyone who is excited by the BDSM lifestyle does in fact have a mental disorder.  Regardless of what the DSM V says, if you have these kind of feelings and they are NOT causing you personal distress, that should be even MORE of an indication that you need help with some deeper lying issue than someone who DOES have personal distress over it.

So while the mainstream media is trying to play this lifestyle off as acceptable, exciting, and “normal,” newsflash; IT’S NOT!!!  And the fact that they are promoting it as such and encouraging this type of behavior is the true “war on women.”

 

-Joseph Forefathers

 

 

“gate” is not a suffix

Blog-Icon---Social

You can read all about the Watergate scandal here, but that’s not the purpose of this post.  This post is to simply vent my frustration about the overuse of the “suffix” “gate.”  The reason I put suffix in quotes is because “gate” isn’t truly a suffix.  Although it is the last part of the word “Watergate,” it is not a suffix.  Watergate is the name of the hotel and office building where the Democratic National Committee headquarters was at the time of the Nixon administration.  And a suffix is a grammatical device which can be attached to a word to denote a certain meaning.   And although I understand that the “gate” “suffix” has come to denote “political scandal” because of Watergate, I find it very troubling how frequently it is use, but  more so that the situations for which it is used are hardly comparable to the original scandal.

[Please note, when I say “hardly comparable,” I mean that the situations that are being compared are either grossly over or under stated.]

My first example is Benghazi “-gate.” And I shudder to even tack that “suffix” on there because of the atrocities associate with this event.  In case any of you need reminders of Benghazi, (and if you do, I’d invite you to stop living under a rock, and join the 21st century) I am referencing the attacks on the US Embassy on the 11th anniversary of September 11, 2001.  Our leaders had warnings, and our embassy personnel had requested backup weeks in advance, which they were not only denied, but had extra security removed!  US Ambassador Christopher Stevens, former Navy SEALs  Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty , and Information Management Officer Sean Smith were all killed during this attack on September 11, 2012.

For this reason I feel that attempting to equate Benghazi to Watergate is a feeble attempt in fully and accurately describing this horrific situation, for which we STILL HAVE YET TO HAVE ANY INDICTMENTS, let alone a trial or convictions!

Nixon was so embarrassed by having any involvement in Watergate, and was certain that he would be impeached and removed from office anyway that he RESIGNED AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!  And nobody even DIED!  For this reason, I will say that at least Nixon was an “honorable” man to recognize the fact that he did wrong and the fact that he no longer should hold the title of the most powerful man in the free world.  Others I cannot say have near the “honor” of Nixon, and did NOT step down from office.

This, obviously, is an example of Watergate falling very short of describing the Benghazi scandal.

Next, “Bridgegate.”

Governor Chris Christie has the George Washington Bridge shut down for several days, causing massive traffic jams.  There was even a FEDERAL investigation by the FBI!  Seriously?!? 

Clearly these people have never been to LA or Houston.   Nobody  DIED because of this traffic jam.   Suck it up and take the Lincoln Tunnel.  And that’s all I’m going to dignify this situation with.  It doesn’t hold a candle to Watergate nor Benghazi.  And people feel it’s accurate to place “gate” as a suffix because they had to endure … dare I say it, bad traffic!?!

So while I’m not the first in making a request for people to stop comparing stupid things  to Watergate, I’m sure I’m not the only one who finds this not only annoying, but inaccurate and inappropriate.

Everything in life is a case by case situation, and everything should be handled as such.  But to continually compare things to Watergate will only hurt your conversation, in my humble opinion.  It’s almost as bad as the constant combining of celebrities’ names, but that’s a different post.

 

-Joseph Forefathers.

 

Like-mindedness; Is it really a bad thing?

Blog-Icon---Social

I’ve noticed throughout the years that on social media, especially on Facebook, blogs, and other personal walls, that there are always the inevitable trolls who show up and want to throw a monkey wrench into an otherwise pleasant conversation.  And inevitably once the pleasant conversation/turned debate becomes heated the troll will accuse the original poster of “surrounding themselves with like-minded people” and follow it up with something to the effect of “you just like being around people who agree with you and pat you on the back BECAUSE they agree with you on something you said.”

To all those trolls, I would like to say this; Why, YES, as a matter of fact I DO.  That’s kind of the point of having FRIENDS!!!

Seriously, when did “surrounding yourself with like-minded people” become an offensive thing and more importantly something to be condescended to?   And when did this become synonymous with being close minded? Because that is what is being insinuated when the comment is made.

I have a LOT of friends, from ALL walks of life.  As you may have gathered from my posts, I am Christian, and I am Conservative (not to be confused with Republican.)

“Oh yeah? Well how many of your friends are Christian and Conservative?”

I have friends, close friends, that identify as all of the following: Liberal, Atheist, Agnostic, Republican, Christian (Catholic, Lutheran, Mormon, Methodist, and Non-denominational)  Wiccan, and deist.  That I know of.  I’m sure there are aspects of some of my friends’ personal lives of which I’m unaware.

And I find it interesting, as deep rooted in my own faith as I am, most of my friends of different religious beliefs pretty much just respect me for what I believe and leave it alone.

Furthermore, I have a handful of Liberal friends with whom I disagree with and we more often than not just agree to disagree on topics.

However…

that being said, I have noticed that MOST, not all, but MOST of my Liberal friends, (and even some of my conservative friends) are the ones that seem to enjoy throwing this proverbial monkey wrench into an otherwise pleasant conversation.   These Liberal friends are people I’ve known since high school, and whom I have added on Facebook.  I’ve tried to communicate with them on a number of occasions, about their lives, congratulate them on engagements, ask about their military experiences, etc.  But from my vantage point, it seems like the only time, and I LITERALLY mean the ONLY time they WANT to communicate is when they are bashing my political views.  It got to the point where I was spending so much time defending my views from their venom on social media that i just had to delete them because I have better things to do, like…I don’t know, live my life!

So seriously, what is wrong with wanting to surround yourself with “like-minded people?” What is wrong with wanting to have friends, and have your viewpoints validated?

Furthermore, if you want to get scientific about it, does anybody remember a little thing called “Maslow’s hierarchy of needs?”

If not, let me break it down for you.

Psychologically we have five basic levels of needs.   These needs are so fundamental in nature that each one of these levels of Needs needs to be met before we can move on to the next level.

The bottom tier is “Physiological Needs”, such as food, shelter, AIR, sleep, basic physical needs in order to live.

The next level is “Safety Needs,” meaning do you feel safe within your shelter, do you have employment  to provide for physiological needs, do you have access to health care, should you need it, etc?

The very NEXT level on this hierarchy is “Social Needs” the need to belong, the need for love, and affection and acceptance.   The NEED for friends,  (also known as like minded people who care about you) is so important it’s number 3 on a list of 5!

The fourth tier is “Esteem Needs.” Basically your self-esteem, personal worth, and social recognition are not as important as your need to belong. (AKA surround yourself with like-minded people.)

And lastly, is “Self-Actualization,” which is truly interesting because it’s the only need that changes.  Once you have reached this tier, self-actualization means you have a specific personal goal and once you have reached that goal it changes, because you’ve accomplished it.  Furthermore, this has gone beyond Social Needs, and Esteem Needs, because you no longer care about what others think.  But paradoxically, you cannot GET to this point without having first fulfilled the other two.

Furthermore, I personally feel like this life is meant to be lived and to be enjoyed.  Who WANTS to spend ALL of their time arguing?  It’s exhausting and depressing.  Who WANTS to be exhausted and depressed all the time just for the sake of an argument? For the sake of proving a point?  Or to be “right?”

Also it should be noted, I’m married.  I married my BEST FRIEND.   We spent a significant time while we were dating making sure that we ARE very “like-minded.”  In our many years of being married, we have watched relationships develop, people marry, and subsequently fail/ get divorced because they did NOT have enough “like-mindedness” and assumed they could get by on chemistry alone.   When it came right down to it, though they were more worried about winning an argument.  The most common reason I’ve heard of for divorce are “irreconcilable DIFFERENCES!”

I’d much rather surround myself with people who I agree with for the sake of happiness and peace.  And for those whom I consider friends with whom I disagree, it’s SO easy to say, “Well, let’s just agree to disagree, and bury the hatchet on that point,” and move on to enjoying life!

What is so important about beating the proverbial dead horse to the point that you are pissing people off, even AFTER THEY have told you several times they want to move beyond the topic to maintain civility?

I’ll give you a hint…

NOTHING!

And if you find yourself being one of these people, let me give you a word of advice:

Get OVER yourself.

-Joseph Forefathers

God, Logic & Understanding

Blog-Icon---Religion

I was raised in a Christian home.   All my life I have been taught that God created all things.  I was also taught that Jesus Christ was His son, and it is through Christ alone that we are able to return to Heaven someday.

God, in all His wisdom, created not only the world, galaxy, and universe, and everything in and on them, but also the laws governing all these realms of existence.  If God created laws to govern the physical world, then it stands to reason that these laws are absolute, and cannot be broken.  We may have only given names to a few of these laws (Law of Gravity, Laws of Thermodynamics, Ideal Gas Law, etc.) but there are other laws God has set into motion such as natural law, as mentioned in the very astute posts “What I Believe,” and “So Called Gay Marriage.”

Another law I would consider to be a “natural law” would be mathematical law.  (1+1=2,  anything that opposes that goes against that natural law.)

I have also been taught, and fully believe that God cannot lie.  He tells the truth, regardless of how that makes us feel.  He tells us what is right.   Isaiah 65:16 tells us that God is a God of truth.

I also believe that because of the numerous references of God, as “Heavenly Father” that we are His  children.  1 John 3:10 tells us we are his children. And that He knows and loves each one of us as any loving father loves his children.  Completely and unconditionally.  And as a Father, God wants to teach us, and wants us to grow, and learn, and succeed.

So if God is our Father, and we are His children, and He only tells us truth, and as children He would want to explain things so we can understand them, and we have scriptures like Acts 7: 55 that describe prophets literally seeing God and Jesus Christ as two separate and distinct individuals, why does so much of Christianity tell us that God, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit are one being in three bodies? In fact he even re-iterates himself in the very next verse 56 as if to say, “LOOK! This is what I saw, don’t misunderstand what I’m saying!”

Matthew 3:16 documents when Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and even describes Jesus being in the water, the Holy Spirit descending in the form of a dove, and in verse 17 God speaking saying, “And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.”

Three separate beings.

John 20:17, after Christ’s resurrection He tells Mary, “touch me not, for I have not yet ascended to my Father.” Why would Jesus talk in third person about “himself” if he is also God the Father?  furthermore why would he have to “ascend to” Him? If He is the being that He needed to visit, talk to, confer with, etc, why would He HAVE to leave in order to do what needed to be done?

When Jesus was a child and he was teaching the elders in the temple Luke 2:49 Jesus directly refers to God as “my Father,” when Mary asked his where he had been.

Why would there be so many references BY Christ himself, to “The Father,” if they were one person?  I know some of you may quote John 10:30  “I and my Father are one.” But I don’t think he meant this physically.   But if he meant that they were in fact ONE BEING, why didn’t he just say it?   Mark 10:8 states “And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.”  But here Jesus is specifically talking about a husband and wife being “one flesh.”  So if he was able to articulate “one flesh” about a husband and a wife, but he only ever spoke about He and his Father as “one,” but constantly talked about the Father in the third person, then to me, that says they are two distinct, individual beings.  Like when my wife and I talk to our kids, if they ask one of us for something, it’s as good as asking both of us.  We are “one in purpose” and as Mark 10:8 says, even “one in flesh,” but that does not mean we are the same person.  I am my own person, just as my wife is her own person, so although we are two individuals, our marriage makes us “one.” Just as The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are “one” it is in purpose, not “one being.”

All this leads me back to Acts 7:55 & 56

55But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God,

56 And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.”

From all this, I know that God is our Heavenly Father.  We are his children.  Jesus Christ is His son. Children from the same father are siblings, so I think it would be fair to conclude that Jesus is our brother.  What an AWESOME thought! And the Holy Spirit is God’s messenger, who speaks to us and gives us guidance.

And that’s what I believe.

-Joseph Forefathers